User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C[edit]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Museo Histórico Militar de Canarias 2023 403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Museo Histórico Militar de Canarias 2023 460.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 875.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 18:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 18:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 879.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Appears to be leaning left (background and main plaque) - slight perspective adjustment required? --Scotch Mist 15:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good spot, I've redone the perspective using the plaque, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York 2017 51 - Marble grave stele.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good composition. --Nacaru 09:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 08:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Wikimedia Hackathon (MP) 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Wikimedia Hackathon (MP) 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good shadows and composition. --Nacaru 23:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:15, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Museo Histórico Militar de Canarias 2023 404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]