User talk:Friniate

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Friniate!

-- 12:49, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Friniate,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aperta richiesta di CU, grazie dell'informazione. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:01, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ben scavato, vecchia talpa! Ne sono stati individuati tre o quattro con un CU, tutti infinitati. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:03, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
E anche questo è finito a far compagnia agli altri nell'archivio calzini puzzolenti. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Il ragazzo pensa che cancellando i tuoi messaggi io non me ne accorga. Deve proprio immaginare che io dorma da piedi... -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, devono imparare i giovanotti. Più o meno come cercare di sorprendere alle spalle qualcuno in una stanza piena di specchi... -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 23:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Devo dire che il ragazzo inizia ad avere una bella storia di SP. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A me lo sai cosa fa più ridere di tutta questa storia? Che il ragazzo pensa che siamo tutti dei perfetti coglioni :-) -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Io gli bloccherei il range IP ... -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:30, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Segnalato. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:51, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A3cb1[edit]

Caarl 95, thank you for your help in tracking A3cb1. In the future, however, please amend an existing RfCU request instead of creating a new one. You have already created four seperate requests (Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Saschuoc44, Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Vantazed, Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Sciuris44 and Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/RULLORULLO475), which makes it difficult to track the CU history; it is better to keep it in one place. See also the instructions at COM:RFCU: "If a case subpage already exists, edit the existing page instead (of creating a new one), either adding to the currently open section (if the case is not yet archived) or adding a new section to the top". Regards, Эlcobbola talk 16:36, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rights[edit]

Hi, I added you the patroller and autopatroller rights. Thanks for your contributions. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:42, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


==Re:== Lasciatelo dire che sei su commons a rovinare l esistenza dell arte sei un copyviol vivente --82.52.35.189 14:28, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely banned user.--Caarl 95 (talk) 16:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
bravo togli le conversazioni invece di informarti sui ritratti --82.55.80.97 14:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Basterebbe non cliccare più sul tastino "carica file" e finirebbe in un attimo ogni motivo di contrasto.--Caarl 95 (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ma basta con sta storia per favore,, almeno guarda il dipinto e noteresti che la qualità del dipinto è fuori dalle protezioni di copyright, dopotutto è un dipinto di metà 600 IL COPYRIGHT DEL RITRATTO è SCADUTO DA ANNI !!!, dato che è stato eseguito da
Valore Casini  (1590–1660)  wikidata:Q3259504
 
Alternative names
casini
Description Italian painter
Date of birth/death 1590 Edit this at Wikidata 1660 Edit this at Wikidata
Location of birth/death Florence Florence
Work period Baroque
era QS:P2348,Q37853
Work location
Authority file
creator QS:P170,Q3259504

ma tanto te sei ottuso e non capisci niente,, non ha mai caricato neanche un file che motivo hai sempre di ostinarti sempre anche quando non ci problemmi --82.55.80.97 15:11, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A prescindere dal copyright e dall'esattezza delle informazioni, sui progetti wikimedia ci sono delle norme minime di comportamento da rispettare. Creare continuamente dei sockpuppet e offendere gli interlocutori non sono esattamente indici di un comportamento consono ai progetti wikimedia. Se vuoi contribuire seriamente, ti fai una vacanza da wikipedia, diciamo per qualche anno, poi al ritorno ti registri, fai presente agli amministratori chi sei e, se la comunità acconsente riprendi ad editare non sgarrando di una virgola.--Caarl 95 (talk) 15:03, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
hhmmm scusami ho avuto uno scatto d' ira nei tuoi confronti,,, ma diciamo che per esempio se io dovessi tornare dopo 2 anni di stop chi mi assicura che gli admin di wikipedia non mi diano ancora del vandalo distruttivo,, e poi chi mi assicura se mi dici di poter editare normalmente e tranquillamente? --95.244.103.63 18:55, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stavo per scriverti che non ci sono (ovviamente) garanzie ma che pensavo che in ogni caso la comunità ti permetterebbe di farti una nuova utenza, quando ho visto la tua ennesima evasione. A prescindere dal merito, hai torto marcio, punto. La fiducia in te da parte della comunità non c'è e non mi pare decisamente recuperabile.--Caarl 95 (talk) 10:41, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User:Mehlauger has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. ツ 02:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. repeated insults, false comments, and bludgeoning.

Adamant1 (talk) 19:13, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about fair use on it.wiki[edit]

Hi. I'm sure your aware of it already, but apparently according [1]https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2021-12-27/italy-copyright-law-updated-for-digital-era/ to this site]] the law in Italy was changed a few years ago to allow "Providers of access to nonprofit online encyclopedias" to "extract text and data from works or other materials available in networks or databases to which they have lawful access, to reproduce them for the protection of cultural heritage and for scientific research, and to communicate the results of their research expressed in new original works to the public." If I'm reading that right I don't see why it wouldn't mean it.wiki could host otherwise copyrighted images of buildings in Italy by copying them from Commons or other websites under the guise of protecting cultural heritage since obviously it.wiki is a nonprofit online encyclopedia. Although Commons couldn't host the files since it isn't one and doesn't allow for fair usage, but I feel like that would help resolve a lot of the problems Italian users are currently having with images of monuments in Italy being deleted. Since the whole thing is clearly badly thought out and ambiguous, at least when it comes to hosting the images on Commons, but you could clearly make a case for hosting the images on it.wiki.

Maybe I'm naive, but I'd like to think issues like the ones brought up in the Village Pump discussion about FOP in Italy could be resolved in a way that benefits everyone by allowing the images to just be uploaded to Italian Wikipedia while being deleted on our end. Otherwise one side of the whole thing is getting screwed. Either we are by letting Italian users keep images that have extremely questionable copyright status' or they are because we would be deleting a lot of images that are being used in Wikipedia articles and would otherwise be kept if we allowed for fair use. But if my reading of the law is correct it could be resolved by just uploading the images to it.wiki under the guise of protecting culture heritage instead of hosting them on Commons. I'm wondering what your thoughts are on it though and if you think that could be a possibility. Adamant1 (talk) 23:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider making a template explaining what you said in your comment so that it can be appended to the relevant photos and cited by others when this comes up on the future. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buontemponi[edit]

Ciao, ma chi è 'sto spiritoso signore che hai pure bloccato qualche giorno fa? -- Blackcat 03:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of panorama, Vatican City[edit]

I started Commons:Deletion requests/File:G. MANZU - Porta della Morte - 1949-64 - ROM - St. Peter - 063.22.jpg, and have some questions: The Vatican is an own country, but according to COM:Vatican City they follow Italian laws here. What do you think: Should there be an addition like in COM:FOP Italy that in deletion requests the same string <noinclude>[[Category:Italian FOP cases/pending]]</noinclude> should be inserted despite being a different country? Or is it worth to create a separate category for this topic? — Speravir00:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]