This specific page is the requests page for the Map Workshop. Anyone can make a request for a map to be created or improved. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.
Make a request
Show manual procedures
Use the following template when making a new request, replacing the examples with your image(s) and request(s):
<gallery>
IMAGENAME.EXT|Description of image
IMAGE#TWO.EXT|2nd image (If there is one)
ETCETCETC.EXT|Don't request too many at once, though
</gallery>
;Request:
: Details of your request go here… --~~~~
;Graphist opinion(s):
SpBotarchives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 185 days. For the archive overview, see /Archive. The latest archive is located at /Archive/2024.
I'm not certain what the best source map would be, but I'd appreciate a Commons-compatible version of the map of Figure 6 (page 37) of this PDF (also accessible via this link) for the draft currently at en:User:Ljleppan/Polttoainehankinta. In addition to the Areas of Responsibility, it would be good to show the locations of en:Helsinki, en:Porkkala and a few of the larger cities (Perhaps en:Turku, en:Vaasa, en:Oulu, en:Rovaniemi and en:Ivalo if possible without sacrificing legibility?).
I'd also greatly appreciate Commons-version of the map(s) in Figure 5 (page 31) of the same PDF, but that's less of a priority.
I suggest adding Puerto Rico to the United States, unless it's not part of the United States.
Puerto Rico is part of the United States. People wonder why many Americans don't know it- well there's your answer. Just because "(US50)" appears in the title doesn't change how this image is actually used- see Hawaiʻi on Wiktionary. The caption there reads: "Hawaii in respect to the rest of the United States". You're giving people a stupid map that would need to be presented in a qualified way, and then that map is being used to imply that this is a map of the whole USA. You now get to choose whether WMF will continue to deceptively imply that Puerto Rico is somehow not part of the United States. Don't bring your decolonization ideological stuff at me when Russia still has Siberia and China has Tibet. As if! Yes Puerto Rico has got a special status. But they voted to become a state a few years ago (it wasn't accepted by the US Congress yet, this is just a fact that tends to discredit any "decolonization" ideological silliness). So Yes, it's the USA. Get off your high horse and show the people the full United States. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 22:26, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
There are locator maps of Puerto Rico within the United States, similar to the above locator map of Hawaii. Take a look at the following maps:
Puerto Rico in United States (zoom + special marker) (US49)
Puerto Rico in United States (zoom + special marker) (US49+1)
Puerto Rico in United States (zoom) (US49)
Puerto Rico in United States (zoom) (US49+1)
Also, you should not blame WMF for ignoring Puerto Rico as part of the US. It is generally not shown along with the 50 states and the federal district as US overseas territories are excluded from most maps. There's no "decolonization" ideology whatsoever on this matter, just a matter of convention. --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 16:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pardon me, my comment above is a little bit intense! All I mean is that I feel that 1) if Puerto Rico appears on a map, 2) and the map does not show Puerto Rico as part of the USA, 3) then there should be a good reason, or a specific purpose for that map, rather than as a general map "of the USA". Hence I renew my request for the update to that map showing Hawai'i without showing Puerto Rico as part of the USA. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 16:16, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is no high quality map of the median line of the Taiwan Strait on Wikimedia Commons or on Wikipedia (the only ones I can find are these I've just uploaded and added here); such a map should be produced.
Please update these maps due to the w:flight of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians. Initially, it would be better to mark this area as uninhabited, because according to the UN there are between 50 and 1,000 people left.
All of Nagorno-Karabakh and the striped areas around it, need to be colored in striped green and white, because almost all Armenians fled the region in September/October 2023, but has still not been populated by Azerbaijani civilians in the striped areas, after Azerbaijan gained it in late 2020. The whole region is patrolled by Azerbaijani troops and police, who are the only human presence, hence why the whole region needs to be colored both in green and white stripes, rather than just in green or just in white. --Multituberculata (talk) 20:54, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello you people who do such wonderful work, can you please help with that one ? The pbms are with the colouring of the islands (red, yellow, or absence thereof). (The refs are all maps in openstreet showing the municipalities' limits and the islands' limits.)
Start with checking on map 4 "Nuevitas" because the red colouring of the islands makes it easier to sort out. In that map, at that scale, we see roughly what looks like 4 of them red islands + a sort of peninsula west of them that's (righfully) attached to Nuevitas municipality by being in red too. Add to that the island in white, on the left of them red ones, and that gives the following list from west to east :
cayo Coco, the island in white in map 4 and in red in map 1. It is with Morón[1]. This one has the proper colour in all 4 maps but I mention it in case you decide to spend some time checking what's what. Knowing what this one is, will help.
cayo Romano Occidental[2]. It belongs to Morón[1], so :
map 1: it should be in red (not in white).
map 2: it should be in yellow (not in white).
map 3: it should be in white (not in yellow).
map 4: it should be in white (not in red).
cayo Romano Oriental[2] is with Esmeralda[3]. It's the island that's got on its north side a long thin island which is cayo Cruz[4], so we can't get that one wrong. But also : it's taken me a while to sort out that the blob on its right, the one that looks (rather loosely) like an elephant with a bloated trump turned towards the left, is supposed to represent cayo Romano Oriental too (determined that by careful comparing of municipalities limits aligned with them cayos, + cayo Romano Oriental is almost 3 times the length of cayo Romano Occidental so that fits these maps too). So :
map 1 and map 2: both blobs ok in white.
map 3: both blobs should be in red (not in yellow).
map 4: both blobs should be in yellow (not in red).
cayo Guajaba[5] is with Nuevitas[6]. This one has the proper colour in all 4 maps.
cayo Sabinal (the "sort of peninsula") is with Nuevitas[6]. This one has the proper colour in all 4 maps.
Of course all the maps for all municipalities in Ciego de Ávila province and in Camagüey province also show the wrong colours for these islands but at least there is no red involved so it doesn't show so much. Besides that, in all the maps, Guáimaro municipality is shown to go all the way to the sea, which it doesn't (see fr:Guáimaro where I added a comment in that sense). For the municipalities in Camagüey province, each of them has a handy section "Municipalités voisines" with a table that gives links to all neighbouring places, + with the corresponding map in each, so you can jump from one to the next without having to go back to commons each time. I just finished that, will do Ciego de Ávila province next.
↑ abcayo Romano, map. It is divided in two : cayo Romano Occidental (name shown in this map) in Morón, Ciego de Ávila; and cayo Romano Oriental (I'm adding the "Oriental" as implied from the other bit, the map gives no name for this one) in Esmeralda, Camagüey.
Those drafts are PNG versions of the original SVG file I'm working in and will upload to commons.
Those drafts are shown for proofreading only.
----
Hi, you really did a great organized request but now when I have a more detailed svg map like this
Empty map draft it's very hard for me transfer your information. Also it seems like the municipals borders are a bit different on this svg map than on the png sources.
Would it be possible for you in some way give me information for each of the four maps what to color with what without referring to the png's?
@Pueblo89 OK, hope you are all right, or on the way, respect that things do take time to recover from. Yes, we can continue but I will need your help/knowledge all the way. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Goran tek-en, nice to see you're still around, and most grateful that you are still willing to work on that, thank you very much. As now demonstrated, I'm only half back so answers may take some days to come up. But i promise that they won't take more than 2 weeks (if health keeps up on my side - know that if i don't hold on to that it'll be because I'm decidedly back in hospital where comms are cut off). Sorry for that, the damn thing is really non-previsible so far.
The "Empty map draft" link is dead (fair enough!), can't see what differences there are with the municipal borders.
If you would be kind enough to let me know what you need, I'll try my best to provide answer/s.
So this is what I have as base map and I would need you to refer to that when telling what island/area to color in what color.
Looks neater than what I worked with, good.
I don't know if you have the possibility to download and make a color mark, number or other for which area to color, then you can email it to me. If not I will find another way for you but that would be best. Please remember that I have zero knowledge of this topic, thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
email would be easiest, only I don't know where to find your email. I'm poorly equipped with that sort of thing (being from the previous millenium), can't see yours and can't/don't know how to put mine up in a safe way. Can make up a random provisional email address which I can publish here, but you'd have to mail something to it +/- within the hour (am online for another hour or so), so I can mail you back my proper email address and we can gop from there. Here is one: trun63+bo3ltjshu46s8@sharklasers.com.
Once that's done, you'll have to give me some time (like 1 to 3 days maybe) to upload the map and mark it with the names we'll need, also what colour goes where exactly. It's been a while since I looked at Cuba, want to check that I did not make mistakes in my description here above. Also need to check boundaries, they are more precise in your map so i want to check that i recognize everything. Pueblo89 (talk) 18:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pueblo89 Please always ping me so I surely see your posts.
If you go to my userpage here in this link, on the left side there is one heading Tools and under that you can find a link saying Email this user.
Hi Goran tek-en, (update 1) I'se sent you an email via wiki and I'm making a start on the map. Simple job (I'm crass at that sort of things, not like you), plain writing for the names of places, in different colours; and lines accordingly coloured joining the names to the places. No other colours: I've tried, it just makes a mess. Pueblo89 (talk) 18:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And added a new twist which I had previously missed: the large archipelago "Jardines de la Reina" on the south coast of Cuba is also divided between Ciego de Avila and Camagüey provinces, so I've surrounded each part and labelled them accordingly ; each part sould be either yellow or white, according to which map you're on - but none of it should be in red, contrary to what it shows in map 3 here above. The three other maps also got that one wrong:
map 1 (Moron, Ciego de Avila) puts it all in white, when the north-west part of it should be yellow.
map 2 (Bolivia, Ciego de Ávila) puts it all in white, when the north-west part of it should be yellow.
map 3 (Esmeralda, Camagüey) puts it all in red, when the north-west part of it should be white and the south-east part should be yellow.
map 4 (Nuevitas, Camagüey) puts the whole archipelago in yellow, when the north-west part of it should be white (in Ciego de Avila) and the south-east part in yellow (Camagüey).
Am also gathering here all the maps needed to check each and every municipality and island concerned :
cayo Coco (for unknown reason, this map does center on cayo Coco but it's decided to not highlight the limits. I'd have been surprised if everything had gone without a glitch. All the others below are fine.)
Apart from this problem here detailed, all the maps (of that series) for municipalities in Ciego de Avila province show cayo Romano Occidental in white (it should be yellow) ; and all the maps (of that series) for municipalities in Camagüey prov. show cayo Romano Occidental in yellow (it should be white). But it's not as important as for those maps here because the articles in which these maps are used do not focus as much on these islands. Plus I imagine it'll be a really boringly repetitive and uninteresting job. So just mentioning here in passing, but let's sort these here out first, the rest can wait. I've got the map all labelled and ready for when you reappear.
@Pueblo89 I don't really understand all the info, but I probably will once you have sent me your maps. Sent you a wiki email because I haven't received any from you. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Goran tek-en, I did send you something via wk, don't know where it's gone. Got your email in my own email box (not wk), just answered it but I find it suspicious that the email address is just "wiki(at)wikimedia.org", hell knows where that is gonna land. So pPlease let me know if you've got it. Thanks! Pueblo89 (talk) 17:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Just realizing that you talk about "maps". So maybe you want one map, labelled, for each municipality? If yes, please just say so - and give me more time (I just received another urgent piece of (paying) work this afternoon). Pueblo89 (talk) 18:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pueblo89:
I think we have to start over again because I can't comprehend which information to use, sorry for that.
The type of maps you want is to my understanding Location maps and for them we do have Conventions which we try to stick to, and that do not include white or red so I'm not sure which colors to use.
You have provided some great information but what I really need is very exact information (not explanations, why or what, just do this) for each of the maps you want me to do. E.a. Map 4) Municipality of Nuevitas in Camagüey prov.; Nuevitas (Camagüey) colored X color, etc.
I don't have any knowledge (and I don't need it, if so I will ask) about any of this, just tell me which color you want for which area and map, and do check the link for Conventions.
Sorry to be troubling about this but my brain can't handle too much information, do hope you understand, thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Goran tek-en, I got all the maps for Cuba's municipalities from Category:Locator maps of municipalities of Cuba, all 150+ of them are used at least once and apart from one fancy map and a couple of others, all of them use white, yellow and red. These maps indicate what region the municipality is in (in yellow), where the municipality is (in red), and the rest is in white with all other municipalities outlined in thin black lines (your map is better; shows thicker lines for regions, that a very nice plus, and outlines for municipalities - therefore for regions too - are much more precise and no gross mistakes like there are in the present maps).
"I'm not sure which colors to use": me neither, and I see a lot less maps than you do I'm sure. I've had a look at the 'conventions' page you link, I don't understand how these conventions can show the same information. Seems to me that they apply to any specific spot but don't cover the 'region' level. If they do, I need to see an example because otherwise I don't get it.
If it's up to me, i most sincerely don't give a fig about "conventions". I care about coherency within a given set; the set I'm looking at is just Cuba, not the rest of the world; that suits me fine for diversity. And as I don't expect you to redo all the maps for all the municipalities in Cuba, I'd rather keep to the white/yellow/red coherency that's already there.
On the other hand, I'm not hung up on that either. You, are going to colour them. You, have your own preferences for whatever set of conventions you want to follow. So you say whatever set of colours pleases you best: what colour for the municipality, what colour for the region that includes said municipality.
Once we get that sorted, I think the best/easiest for you will be that I make one labeled map for each municipality, pointing out which municipality and which region takes which colour (and I leave the rest blank anyway so you can put whatever colour you want for the rest). That way, no blabla (which would indeed do my head in too if I was in your shoes, no contest about that!): when you colour the maps you won't even have to think what colour goes where, just apply it from the labels I'll have put.
Hi Goran tek-en, ah, ok. At least we've got some red here; so that would do for the municipalities.
According to that set of conventions, the region in which the municipality is, would be in the colour for "Surrounding territories (Internal)", called "#FDFBEA" ; and the other regions of Cuba would be in the colour for "Surrounding landmass (Outside)", called #DFDFDF (the coloured rectangles don't want to come up when I copy-paste their codes here). Have I got that right ?
In Category:Locator maps of municipalities of Cuba there are 5 maps that use the "zoom" thing. In this particular case i think it needlessly complicates the maps : your blank already includes the contours of all municipalities, that's good enough we don't need more.
yes for Territory of interest / Marked / Focus, #C12838, .
ok for Surrounding territories (Internal), "#FDFBEA", , for the region/province to which the municipality belongs.
The "other internal division of the same administrative level, #F5F5F5", , does not give enough contrast with the "#FDFBEA" . I can hardly see the difference and there are many people whose eyesight is even worse than mine. I really don't think it's appropriate (in fact I find it most unconsiderate). The "Surrounding landmass (Outside), #DFDFDF", , seems much better. Can distinguish it much more easily from "#FDFBEA" .
Hi Goran tek-en (update) I've sent you the 4 maps by email, one for each municipality, labelled and with some spots of colour. Can you check them and tell me if it's enough or if you want more details ? Thanks! Pueblo89 (talk) 19:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pueblo89 I tried the coloring we talked about before but it doesn't work on the 3 small islands when viewed at 100%.
So I suggest this coloring as it also work for most people with color deficiencies and has better contrast.
What do you mean, 'fill me in on 1 and 2'? (sorry, I'm getting cotton-stuffed head with my current job. Did you get my email with the 4 maps labelled and with colour points?)
Point 1: here on openstreetmap, the limits of the municipio of Nuevitas. It shows where the red is supposed to stop, that's pretty much where you stopped it. At that scale I wouldn't try to be more finicky than that, really: it won't make much difference. As it is, it shows that the municipio stops before what looks like the end of the land at that scale. Good. Anyone who needs more precision can look at openstreet map or similar.
Point 2: yes you got that bang right too.
Point 3 (Jardines de la Reina in the south): yes the colour for the region is fine for larger areas but it's hardly distinguisable on land surfaces that small. That's why the yellow was better, needs v. strong contrasts for these small bits. A darker shade maybe?
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 13:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Can someone please update this graph to the latest version using the information in the Keir Starmer section on the Wikipedia page linked above, which as of the time of writing stetches from April 2020 to 19 Sep 2023. Helper201 (talk) 19:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Description of third image (if needed; don't request too many at once, though)
Article(s): [[]]
Request
An update is needed since a source from en:UNOSAT (link here) has given demarcation for the new state of north Somalia SSC-Khatumo. Could someone incorporate the UNOSAT source on Khatumo borders into the above map please? --Billboardbillal (talk) 10:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the colours for "Legal for medical use and decriminalized" and "Decriminalized" are quite similar and could lead to confusion, especially on small screens like mobiles and for people with sight and colour blindness and similar such issues. So, I think more different/distinct colours could be used for this map, taking into account colour blindness and sight issues and just generally be easier to distinguish between for everyone. Helper201 (talk) 17:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
Create vector static map for commuter rail network[edit]
@OrdinaryScarlett As it is the requester who has the knowledge about the subject and the graphic workers knows the graphic, it's common that the requester provides a good free source for the request. Graphic worker doesn't generally do research and reads a lot of text etc, thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 18:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The two merge together and both end at the same point; at Washington Union Station. Because of the way that these maps work, unfortunately you can only see one line over the other when they overlap. But yes, they both at the same point. --OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 05:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
New accurate map in SVG of the visa policy of the Democratic Republic of the Congo[edit]
Example 1 : visa policy of South Africa
Example 2 : visa policy of Tunisia
Article(s):
Request
The current file for the visa policy of the Democratic Republic of the Congo is an old PNG, not up to do date and that does not even show eVisa. Please make one like South Africa or Tunisia as shown above. Thank you. -- Calvinsky (talk) 11:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
This is originally created by Maxxl2 , I just corrected some location.But sadly it saved into PNG.
The old map is attached in the gallery. B. centroura is now only found in the Western Atlantic. The map for B. lata needs to include the portion removed from B. centroura and that included on its FishBase native range map [5]--Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 15:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Update request for the linguistic and ethnicity maps of the Armenian language and the Armenian people[edit]
File:Map-of-speakers-of-armenian.png – Nagorno-Karabakh needs to be removed
File:Idioma armenio.png – Nagorno-Karabakh needs to be removed
File:Idioma azerí.png – Nagorno-Karabakh needs to be colored in blue
File:Armenian distribution map.png – Nagorno-Karabakh needs to be colored in brown
File:ArmenianDiaspora.png – Nagorno-Karabakh needs to be removed
File:Diàspora armènia.png – Nagorno-Karabakh needs to be removed
File:Map of the Armenian Diaspora in the World.svg – Azerbaijan needs to be colored in gray as there are less than 1,000 Armenians after the flight of virtually all Armenians with the dissolution of Nagorno-Karabakh and Turkey needs to be colored in (+ 10,000) very light brown, as there are less than 100,000 Armenians
Article(s): Many articles across Wikipedia.
Request
These linguistic and ethnicity maps of the Armenian language and the Armenian people need to be updated after the Flight of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians in 2023, which has resulted in the total ethnic cleansing of the Armenians from Nagorno-Karabakh and thus from all of Azerbaijan, after Azerbaijan took all of Nagorno-Karabakh. There is no Armenian community left anymore within Azerbaijan's internationally recognized borders. --Multituberculata (talk) 08:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are changes and corrections that should be made to this map. Firstly, Morocco and Syria should be in grey, as there is no cited information on the above linked Wikipedia page to say suicide is illegal in either country (as the map currently claims). Secondly, Chile and Cuba should be in green as suicide is cited as legal in both, while assisted is suicide illegal. Helper201 (talk) 01:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
Update request for the Indonesia Ethnic Groups Map[edit]
Is there anyone here who would like to make revisions, additions, and also make an English version of this map? I already have a list of things that need to be revised and updated, but I will mention these things in stages considering the length of the list I have. Note: I already have the name labels on this map in English and Indonesian, so you don't need to translate them anymore, just write them on the map. --Ibrahim Muizzuddin (talk) 08:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Article(s): Name of article the image will be used in to link on English Wikipedia: Visa Policy Of Turkmenistan for Non-Ordinary Passports
Request
Hi, was just hoping if anyone can update the map by adding Singapore into the list of visa-exempt countries for Diplomatic and Official/Service Passport Holders as map is outdated. For more information on the single change required, you can try to text me at Suomi2023 but I am not always online. Thank you.
Could someone make a version of this map in US English?
The idea is to have a good map in English of the Thirteen Colonies as they existed in 1775 before the US Declaration of Independence: a map that is not anachronistic—that is, a map that doesn't show boundaries of US states that did not exist at the time. إيان (talk) 23:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bringing this back from the archive. Seeking help in completing the translation by changing 'Sankt-Lorenz-Strom' to 'St. Lawrence River'. إيان (talk) 01:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Timeshifter. I am not sure to directly help here but I would like to share some thoughts related to your request:
I found that for many users editing a "simple" text file such as svg is not so obvious. For this reason I think it will be nice to have a graphical interface to do so. For this reason I started working on a tool like this one. The interface is not very good but it has some nice features to help editing maps. I can upload more maps if needed.
Few years ago I made a proposal to seaparate the css files from the svg. In fact, we have a lot of maps that represent the same countries or regions but need different colours. I though that it will be good to have one svg with the geographica representation and a separate file for the colours. There was some intresting discussion on this but not accepted.
I think we will need to have some deeper discussion on the format for this kind of svg maps. I personally belive that it will be good to have some classes and features in the svg that can help automatic detection of specific elements or machine use for editing.
Ikonact. cmglee is the main creator of the map templates. Maybe he can tell us what he thinks of your maps.
I have a question. Is there a way to paste in a list of states and values into your maps. To make maps with the data on the maps. That is what is possible with cmglee maps. It is very easy to do. Just need the list. A good set of colors is already in the map. Those colors can be changed.
cmglee can probably adapt this data map template method to other countries and their subnational areas (states, provinces, etc.). --Timeshifter (talk) 17:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's a useful tool, @Ikonact: Though I prefer scripting, I can see other editors preferring a GUI. Will it have a way to save a draft and resume editing, or to load someone else's map to make changes?
I didn't see your proposal in 2017, and would very much welcome having SVG files referencing or transcluding other files. I've been using a hack using systemLanguage so that a single SVG can generate different thumbnails, e.g. for each tower's article:
@Cmglee: I remember, I have seen your svg with the towers and I find it a good idea. I find it a twist as the purpose of the systemLanguage is different but I agree it is a good work around. The main issue is that this will not work for multiple elements - if you wish to highlight several states on a map for example. I will be glad if we can propose something that make sense. I have to admit I am playing solo for the moment :-) Ikonact (talk) 13:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a valid SVG file edited in Inkscape but saved as plain SVG. When I look at this file in Inkscape or in a web browser, the arrowheads are pointing in the correct direction. When viewed on Wikimedia, the arrowheads all point to the right. Any help is gratefully received for getting the arrows to render properly on Wikimedia. --MartinPoulter (talk) 16:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've updated this to a version without arrowheads. The previous version had the arrowhead problem: I still welcome advice on how I can put arrows into diagrams in Inkscape and have the arrowheads render properly on Wikimedia. MartinPoulter (talk) 15:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These maps of the European Union (and likely more! this I found in the same category) still have the United Kingdom, despite it having leaving years ago. --Juwan (talk) 17:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 13:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Map workshop
A potential base map
_(US50)_(-grid).svg/120px-Hawaii_in_United_States_(zoom)_(US50)_(-grid).svg.png)
Description of first image_(US50)_(-grid).svg)
_(US49).svg/120px-Puerto_Rico_in_United_States_(zoom_+_special_marker)_(US49).svg.png)
Puerto Rico in United States (zoom + special marker) (US49)_(US49+1).svg/120px-Puerto_Rico_in_United_States_(zoom_+_special_marker)_(US49+1).svg.png)
Puerto Rico in United States (zoom + special marker) (US49+1)_(US49).svg/120px-Puerto_Rico_in_United_States_(zoom)_(US49).svg.png)
Puerto Rico in United States (zoom) (US49)_(US49+1).svg/120px-Puerto_Rico_in_United_States_(zoom)_(US49+1).svg.png)
Puerto Rico in United States (zoom) (US49+1)_(US49).svg)
_(US49+1).svg)
_(US49).svg)
_(US49+1).svg)
Example
Example
--Swiãtopôłk (talk) 16:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
status
original
Map showing the locations of all NCAA Division I men's college ice hockey teams
Artsakh needs removing
Saint Kitts and Nevis, Jamaica and Fiji need to be grey as they have no official Railways
Artsakh is being dissolved, Ukraine and Moldova have left Commonwealth of Independent States and CISFTA
.svg)
_(claims_hatched).svg)
_(disputed_hatched).svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
_(claims_hatched).svg)
_(disputed_hatched).svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
_(claims_hatched).svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
_(claimed_and_disputed_hatched).svg)
_(claims_hatched).svg)
_(disputed_hatched).svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
_(claims_hatched).svg)
_(disputed_hatched).svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
Artsakh needs removing
Artsakh needs removing
.png/615px-Morón_(Cuban_municipal_map).png)
1) Municipality of Morón in Ciego de Ávila province.png/615px-Bolivia_(Cuban_municipal_map).png)
2) Municipality of Bolivia in Ciego de Ávila province.png/615px-Esmeralda_(Cuban_municipal_map).png)
3) Municipality of Esmeralda in Camagüey prov..png/615px-Nuevitas_(Cuban_municipal_map).png)
4) Municipality of Nuevitas in Camagüey prov..png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
Raster map file
SVG
.svg/94px-Somali_Civil_War_(2009-present).svg.png)
Description of first image.svg)
.png/120px-Map_of_the_South–North_Water_Transfer_Project_in_China_(de).png)
Raster German language map.png)
This map is not up-to-date.
Raster map file #1
Raster map file #2 (also needs to be updated)
Example 1 : visa policy of South Africa
Example 2 : visa policy of Tunisia
This is originally created by Maxxl2 , I just corrected some location.But sadly it saved into PNG.
A map showing the current status of government each county in Massachusetts, based on information from Abolitions of some county governments section of the List of counties in Massachusetts article
File:Europe countries map en 2.png
File:Map-of-speakers-of-armenian.png – Nagorno-Karabakh needs to be removed
File:Idioma armenio.png – Nagorno-Karabakh needs to be removed
File:Idioma azerí.png – Nagorno-Karabakh needs to be colored in blue
File:Armenian distribution map.png – Nagorno-Karabakh needs to be colored in brown
File:ArmenianDiaspora.png – Nagorno-Karabakh needs to be removed
File:Diàspora armènia.png – Nagorno-Karabakh needs to be removed
File:Map of the Armenian Diaspora in the World.svg – Azerbaijan needs to be colored in gray as there are less than 1,000 Armenians after the flight of virtually all Armenians with the dissolution of Nagorno-Karabakh and Turkey needs to be colored in (+ 10,000) very light brown, as there are less than 100,000 Armenians
Map with JF-17 jet airplane operators in blue, loctaed on the following Wikipedia page
Suicide legislation world map
Map of ethnic groups in Indonesia in Russian
Done --Rtfroot (talk) 18:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Request taken by — Meghmollar2017 • Talk • 06:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Map of the Thirteen Colonies what appears to be German
Half done – I have translated most German elements into English, except Sankt-Lorenz-Strom, which I have not translated yet for some reasons. Here is the English-version map: Thirteencolonies politics cropped-en.jpg. --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 17:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Map of the Ottoman Empire in 1590
,_administrative_divisions_-_de_-_colored_(EU_labeled).svg)
,_administrative_divisions_-_de_-_colored.svg)
,_administrative_divisions_-_ISO3166_-_colored_(EU_labeled).svg)
,_administrative_divisions_-_ISO3166_-_colored.svg)
,_administrative_divisions_-_Nmbrs_-_colored_(EU_labeled).svg)
,_administrative_divisions_-_Nmbrs_-_colored.svg)
,_administrative_divisions_-_de_-_colored_(marker).svg)
,_administrative_divisions_-_de_-_colored_(multizoom).svg)
,_administrative_divisions_-_Nmbrs_-_colored_(marker).svg)
,_administrative_divisions_-_Nmbrs_-_colored_(multizoom).svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
